Hello Cardinal Fans!
Our Cardinals are in the midst of a tough
schedule for their September run for a playoff spot. They
are playing much better, but it may be too little, too late.
WORLD SERIES DINNER AT BIG CYPRESS
OCTOBER 11
or Tuscan Garlic Chicken cutlets fraped in parmesan cream
sauce that has been tossed with sweet pepper and spinach.
Along with: Salad, roasted root
vegetable, roasted asparagus, roll and butter
Dessert: Strawberry Short cake
SPEAKER: Still to be determined.
Assistant General Manager Gary Larocque
is working to find us the perfect speaker for our organization.
INTERESTING ARTICLE FROM THE ATHLETIC:
Don't expect mass front-office changes |
Fans in a number of
major-league cities want change. Ownership changes in many
cases, yes. But front-office changes, at the very least.
And in many cases, those changes seem unlikely.
“I’m a huge believer in
stability and continuity, and those are competitive
advantages in professional sports, that reacting and
change don’t necessarily mean improvement,” Blue Jays
president Mark Shapiro
said last month
when asked about the job status of his general manager,
Ross Atkins.
No one should be
surprised in the coming weeks to hear similar comments
from other executives with disappointing clubs. Which
raises the questions: Why are owners so complacent? Why
aren’t more front offices on the hot seat?
Many fans of the Blue
Jays are exasperated, if not downright angry. Ditto for
fans of the Cardinals, Mariners, Giants, Reds and
Pirates. Those teams intended to contend and didn’t. And
yet, more trust-the-process blather likely is coming their
fans’ way. (Insular, sadsack franchises — the White Sox,
Athletics, Marlins and Rockies, to name four —
belong in a separate category. Those teams barely even
bothered to try.)
For underachieving
clubs, managers are always easy scapegoats. The Mariners
already fired theirs. The Reds, Pirates and others might,
too. But modern managers are glorified middle men,
extensions of their front offices. A managerial change
often is an act of deflection by the head of baseball
operations, a bid to buy more time.
Shapiro had a point.
Stability and continuity indeed should be valued. If
teams, particularly in this age of social media, reacted
to every fan eruption, they would be firing people every
three days, if not every three minutes.
Still, the passivity in
the sport is disturbing. Part of it might stem from the
expansion of the postseason in 2022, and the illusion of
contention provided by the addition of a third wild card
in each league. Consider the Cubs. A good month of August
thrust them into the fringes of the wild-card race, and
now things don’t look so bad, if you’re willing to
overlook how for four months they underachieved.
Another factor is the
analytically based groupthink that pervades front offices.
Fire your head of baseball operations, and who will you
hire? Probably another executive whose decision-making is
not all that dissimilar from the one you let go.
The biggest issue,
though, is that many teams face minimal financial
pressure, the kind of pressure that would motivate a
business to act. |
Q AND A FROM THE POST:
I could see some fans looking at a lower payroll and using that as
a reason not to go to games. The sentiment then being, "If they're
not going to spend to have a competitive team, then why should I
spend my money? If they want to cut payroll and go into the season
expecting not to contend, then why should I pay for that?
Q
I think Luken Baker, International League MVP for 2023, has
been a pleasant surprise. What are the chances Mo lets Goldy walk
and goes with a tandem at first next year?
Go Cardinals – I’m still believing!
Bruce
Bruce Wolfe, President
Go Cardinalsnation.us